As the best budget smartphones in the Windows and Android camps, we compare the Motorola Moto E and Nokia Lumia 530 spec for spec to see whether your money is better spent with Microsoft or Motorola. Read our Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E comparison review.
Before we start, we should point out that in this comparison review we are merely comparing the specs of these two amazing-value smartphones. For more in-depth analysis check out our Motorola Moto E review, and come back soon for our Nokia Lumia 530 review.
You might also be interested in our Nokia Lumia 520 vs Nokia Lumia 530 and Motorola Moto E vs Motorola Moto G comparisons.
Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E: Pricing and UK availability
Motorola's Moto E is available now, and it costs just £89. The Nokia Lumia 530 is launching this month (August) and, although Nokia has yet to confirm an exact price (it says below 100 Euro), Mobile Fun is listing the Lumia 530 at £90. That puts a difference of only £1 between these two Windows Phone and Android smartphones. For the best deal on either phone check out our Best SIM-only deals.
Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E: Design and build
In terms of design the Motorola Moto E and Nokia Lumia 530 are very similar. Both are pebble-design smartphones with interchangeable colourful rear cases (sold separately). The Nokia is slightly lighter than the Motorola, at 129- versus 142g, and it's also a little bit thinner at 11.7mm against the Moto E's 12.3mm. The Moto E is also wider and taller, if only by a tad, at 64.8x124.8mm against the Lumia 530's 62.3x119.7mm.
Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E: Display
In the display category the Motorola Moto E is victorious, with a 4.3in qHD (540x960 pixels) panel with an anti-smudge and splashproof coating. This 256ppi screen also uses tough protective Gorilla Glass. The Nokia Lumia 530 uses a 4in (480x854) 245ppi LCD screen.
Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E: Processor, graphics and performance
Without getting both handsets into our lab it is impossible to determine which is faster. The fact they run different operating systems is also important, since Windows Phone is traditionally able to run on lower-spec hardware than is Android.
For what it's worth, both are paired with a 1.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chip, the Motorola a dual-core version and the Nokia a quad-core. The Moto E has twice the Lumia 530's 512MB RAM allocation, at 1GB, and both run Adreno 302 graphics.
We've yet to run the Nokia Lumia 530 through our standard benchmarks, although performance from the Motorola Moto E wasn't anything to write home about. That's to be expected from a phone this cheap, although it's worth pointing out that in everyday use the Moto E is mostly smooth and can quickly switch between apps. We saw only occasional lag.
In Geekbench 3 the Moto E turned in a multi-core score of 608 points. That's higher than other cheap phones such as the ZTE Kis 3 and Samsung Galaxy Fame, but some way down on the 2014 flagships.
Graphics performance is more impressive, and in GFXBench's T-Rex benchmark produced a result of 11fps - just shy of the far more expensive Huawei Ascend P7.
Web browsing, however, was rather jerky in our tests, and the Moto E took a couple of seconds to zoom in when you double-tap. It managed 1877ms in SunSpider, but that's not the worst score we've seen. You can see how the Motorola Moto E's performance compares to that of other recent smartphones we've tested in our article What's the fastest smartphone 2014.
Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E: Storage
The Nokia Lumia 530 is the clear frontrunner on the storage front. Not only does its microSD support stretch to 128GB - the Moto E lets you add only 32GB - but it comes with 15GB of free cloud storage via OneDrive. Since both phones are supplied with just 4GB of internal storage you will need to look at other options for storing photos, videos and apps.
And on that front it's also worth pointing out that while you can store apps on the Nokia Lumia 530's microSD card, the Motorola Moto E will move only a small amount of an app's data on to removable memory. This means you could quickly run out of internal storage if you want to download and run a lot of apps on the Moto E. (Of course, you could even now argue that finding more apps than for which you have storage won't be a problem with Windows Phone.)
Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E: Cameras
Neither of these budget smartphones will replace a dedicated camera. Their 5Mp fixed-focus snappers are handy to have on you for a quick shot, but don't expect the best quality. The Lumia 530 supports slightly higher-resolution video than does the Moto E - 480x854 vs 720p, both at 30fps. Neither have a flash, and neither have a front-facing camera so selfies are out too.
Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E: Connectivity
The Nokia Lumia 530 and Motorola Moto E are evenly matched on the connectivity front. Both feature 2.4GHz 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4 and GPS. They both accept Micro SIMs, use Micro-USB for charging, and have 3.5mm headphone jacks. Neither are 4G-compatible - for a cheap 4G phone look to the Mototola Moto G or EE Kestrel.
Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E: Software
Both smartphones run the latest versions of their respective operating systems (the Nokia Lumia 530 runs Windows Phone 8.1, while the Motorola Moto E has Android KitKat). The Moto E is guaranteed an upgrade to Android L when it becomes available in the autumn, and you can expect any Windows Phone updates to also be available to the Lumia 530.
A major difference between the two operating systems is apps. While Windows Phone is gradually getting more and more apps, it still lags Android. Of course, as we mentioned in the storage section of this comparison review, you'll be able to store only so many apps on the Motorola Moto E regardless of what's available.
The recent Windows Phone 8.1 update turns Windows Phone into a tempting proposition. We've always been fans of its colourful tiled interface, but the addition of proper notifications and the Cortana voice assistant, among other upgrades, is welcome. Of course, Android has had all this for some time now.
The Motorola Moto E runs an almost vanilla version of Android KitKat, with just a few tweaks. There are a few familiar Motorola apps, such as Motorola Migrate and Motorola Assist, while new to the Moto E is Motorola Alert. This can let people know you've arrived safely somewhere, you can use it to help meet a friend and there's an emergency mode.
The Nokia Lumia 530 has some very decent preinstalled software. We particularly like the excellent Nokia Maps application with HERE Drive+ for free navigation, as well as MixRadio, which offers unlimited ad-free music streaming, even offline.
With app storage something of an issue for the Motorola Moto E, we can't really churn out that tired old apps argument. In truth, whether you go with Windows Phone or Android will really come down to personal preference. There is nothing that you would expect from a budget phone such as these that either Windows Phone or Android cannot do.
Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E: Battery life
As with performance, it's impossible to assess battery life without a thorough assessment of each smartphone. The Moto E has a larger-capacity battery at 1980mAh versus the Lumia 530's 1430mAh but, as we mentioned earlier, not only do these handsets run different operating systems but they differ in their screens - a major culprit behind battery drain.
While we can confirm Motorola's claims of up to 24 hours of mixed usage for the Moto E, we are unable to verify Nokia's suggestion that the Lumia 530 can last up to 22 days on standby, or offer 10 hours of talk time. We'd expect that both phones would be more than capable of lasting a full day away from the mains, however.
One important difference is that only the Nokia Lumia 530's battery is removable. Whether anyone would actually carry around a spare battery for their phone is another matter. We'd much prefer to use a portable USB charger - check out the 9 best portable USB chargers 0f 2014.
Still not sure which is the best budget phone? Check out the 16 best budget smartphones of 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment